Posts Tagged ‘Sony Ericsson’

The Dangerous Liaisons (Updated)

August 22, 2011 1 comment

Did you know that a smartphone might involve as many as 250,000 patent claims? You may easily understand why the $ 4.5 billion auction to buy 6,000 Nortel patents by the consortium formed by Apple, Microsoft, Research in Motion, Sony Ericsson and EMC was so cruel. You may also easily understand why Google, the loser of the Nortel auction, decided to react immediately acquiring Motorola and its patent portfolio made of more than 17,000 approved patents (and another 7,500 patents filed and pending approval) for the large sum of $ 12.5 billion.

Said in few words, the mobile arena is getting more and more agressive and cruel. For this reason, a litte bit for curosity, a little bit for fun, I decided to draw a chart (and a table) showing all the moves of the giant players in this mobile chessboard. Although deliberately incomplete (I did not show in the table the patent saga of NTP Inc. against the rest of the world and the settlement of Motorola vs RIM), it gives a good idea of the dangerous intersections involving partnership, fees, alliances and, most of all, lawsuits… With the strange paradox that some companies (read Apple and Samsung) are enemies before the court, but in the same time business partners.

While visualizing the idea I stumbled upon this similar graph showing the status of the mobile arena on 8 Oct 2010. I decided to use the same layout, omitting some informations, but updating it to the current date. The graph is a little bit confusing, but the confusion of the arrows reflects betten than a thousand words the real situation.

Anyway the war will not stop here: the next targets? Interdigital Inc. with its 8,800 patents  which are attracting several bidders such as Apple, Nokia and Qualcomm; and, most of all, Kodak, whose survival depends on the auction of the 10% of its patent portfolio (1,100 patents), valued as high as $3 billion which are vital to compensate the losses estimated in $2.5 billion.

As far as the table is concerned, in order to avoid repetitions, it only shows the status of the lawsuits and alliances from the perspective of Google, Apple and Microsoft. Enjoy your read and the 250,000 patent claims on your smartphone!

Company Filed Suit Against Has technological alliance with Filed Suite From:
  No one (at least so far!)

Of course Google licensees his Mobile OS to HTC and Samsung (in rigorous alphabetical order), and it is the driver for the impressive market share growthof Samsung and HTC.

In an effort to defend Android’s Intellettual Property “to supercharge the Android ecosystem and will enhance competition in mobile computing”, on Aug 15 2011, Google announced the intention to acquire Motorola Mobility with a $12.5 billion deal. Motorola has nearly 17,000 patents.

Aug 12 2010: Oracle has filed suit against Google for infringing on copyrights and patents related to Java,. Oracle claimed Google “knowingly, directly and repeatedly infringed Oracle’s Java-related intellectual property”. Android uses a light proprietary Java Virtual Machine, Dalvik VM, which, according to Oracle infringes one or more claims of each of United States Patents Nos. 6,125,447; 6,192,476; 5,966,702; 7,426,720; RE38,104; 6,910,205; and 6,061,520.

The case is in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, is Oracle America, Inc v. Google Inc, 10-3561.

The lawsuit is still pending and will likely take several months. The trial between Oracle and Google is expected to begin by November and Oracle is seeking damages “in the billions of dollars” from Google.

On Aug 1 2011, the judge overseeing the lawsuit Oracle filed over the Android mobile OS has denied Google’s attempt to get a potentially damaging e-mail redacted.

Mar 2 2010: Apple sued HTC for infringing on ten patents, nine of which involve technologies which apply to the iPhone, while one involves the use of gestures, but only in a specific use case.

The suit has been filed in the U.S. District Court in Delaware , alleging twenty instances of patent infringement. The company also petitioned the US  ITC to block the import of twelve phones designed and manufactured by HTC.

On Jul 15 2011 Apple won a preliminary patent ruling in an early judgment before the US ITC, in which HTC was found to have breached two of 10 patents held by Apple.

On Aug 8 2011 ITC  announced to have dediced to review Apple’s patent infringement complaint against HTC.

Oct 31 2010: In response to Motorola lawsuit against Apple, Apple sued Motorola and Motorola Mobility for Infringment on several Multi-Touch patents infringments in the Wisconsin Western District Court with two distinct lawsuits. A total of six patents are involved in the two lawsuits.

On Nov 23, 2010: US International Trading Commission announced to review Apple patent case against Motorola.

Apr 18 2011: Apple filed suit against Samsung for copying the design of its iPad and iPhone with its smartphones and tablets.

Aug 10 2011: European customs officers have been ordered to seize shipments of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab computers after the ruling late on Tuesday by a German patents court.

In the last days Apple has been accused of presenting inaccurate evidence against Samsung.

Aug 24 2011: Samsung has been banned from selling some galaxy phones in the Netherlands. The ban is set to begin on October 13, but Samsung doesn’t seem to be taking it too hard.

On Jul 1 2011 the intellectual property of the Canada giant Nortel (in Bankrupt), involving 6,000 patents, was sold for $4.5 billion, in a dramatic auction, to a consortium formed by Apple, Microsoft, RIM, Sony, EMC and Ericsson. Google was the other competitor (and the big looser) for the deal. This event acted as a trigger for the acquisition of Motorola Mobility by Google.

On Aug 3 2011, In a post to the Official Google Blog, Google Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer David Drummond said that Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, and others have waged “a hostile, organized campaign against Android” by snapping up patents from Novell and Nortel and asking Google for high licensing fees for every Android device”, accusing them of Patent Bulying.

Curiously, Apple is one of the main technological partners of Samsung for displays and semi-conductors. Samsung produces Apple’s A4 systems-on-a-chip (SoC) and also the two companies collaborate for iPad displays (Apple is moving from LG to Samsung because oof quality issues of the former). Nevertheless the lawsuits between the two companies are compromising their relationships so that Apple is evaluating a new supplier (TSMC) for its A6 nexy generation chipset.

Oct 22 2009: Nokia sued Apple in Delaware court for infringing on  ten patents related to GSM, UMTS, and WLAN standards that Nokia states they established after investing more than EUR 40 billion in R&D over the last 20 years.

On Jun 14 2011 Apple agreed to pay between $300m and $600m to cover the 111m iPhones sold since its launch in 2007. Although the exact number was not specified, additional yearly fees could be part of the agreement.

On Jan 2010 Kodak sued Apple and RIM claiming Apple is infringing its 2001 patent covering technology that enables a camera to preview low-resolution versions of a moving image while recording still images at higher resolutions. The cases were filed in U.S. District Court in Rochester, N.Y., as well as the U.S. ITC.

On Apr 2010 Apple argues that some Kodak still and video camera products violate two of its patents

On Jul 2011: While Kodak’s claim is pending, the commission rules on Apple’s complaint and says Kodak’s digital-camera technology doesn’t violate Apple’s patents.

Oct 6 2010: Motorola sued Apple for patent infringement in three separate complaints; in district courts in Illinois and Florida and a separate complaint filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission. The suits covered 18 different patents, infiringed by Apple’s iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, and certain Mac computers.

The Motorola patents include wireless communication technologies, such as WCDMA (3G), GPRS, 802.11 and antenna design, and key smartphone technologies including wireless e-mail, proximity sensing, software application management, location-based services and multi-device synchronization.

Jan 12 2011: Microsoft has motioned for a summary judgment to block Apple from trademarking the phrase “app store,” as it filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on July 17, 2008.

Mar 30 2011: Microsoft filed a second objection to Apple’s enduring pursuit to trademark the phrase “app store hiring a linguist, Dr. Ronald Butters, to go head-to-head against Apple’s own hired linguist, Robert A. Leonard.

On Jul 1 2011 US ITC said Apple has violated two S3 Graphics Co. patents in its Mac OS X operating system, but not in the iOS platform. Although not directly related to Mobile, this ruling is meaningful since S3 has been acquired by HTC on Jul 6 2011 for $300 million in order to use their patents in the fight against Apple.

HTC expects final ruling on Apple-S3 graphics case in November.

On Aug 16 2011 HTC filed a new lawsuit against Apple in Delaware’s US District Court, in an escalation of the legal battle between the two smartphone giants. HTC accused Apple to have infringed three of HTC’s patents through its sale of devices including iPads, iPods, iPhones and Macintosh computers.

Oct 1 2010: Microsoft sued Motorola for patent infringement relating to the company’s Android-based smartphones. Microsoft filed its complaint with the International Trade Commission and in a Washington state district court. At issue are nine patents that deal with, among others, sending and receiving e-mail, managing and syncing calendars and contacts, and managing a phone’s memory.

Patent dispute will begin from Aug 21 2011, the hearing procedure can take up to 10 days, the judgment procedure is expected to reach the final verdict point only in March 2012.

Nov 9 2010: Microsoft sued again Motorola for charging excessive royalties on network technology used in Microsoft’s Xbox game system.

Feb 11 2011: a deal with the Devil, Microsoft and Nokia announce their plansto form a broad strategic partnership that would use their complementary strengths and expertise to create a new global mobile ecosystem.

Besides the alliances with Apple and RIM (see the corresponding cell), on May 12 2011 Microsoft has teamed up with HTC, Nokia and Sony Ericsson in Europe, filing a challenge seeking to invalidate Apple’s trademarks on the phrases “App Store” and “Appstore.”

Nov 11 2010: Motorola Mobility sued Microsoft with the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida and the Western District of Wisconsin alleging infringement of sixteen patents by Microsoft’s PC and Server software, Windows mobile software and Xbox products.

Motorola Mobility asked for the infringing devices to be barred from importation into the United States.

On Dec 21 2010, ITC has agreed to hear the complaint.

Astici, Androidi e Tablet (Prima Parte)

January 15, 2011 Leave a comment

L’inusuale accostamento che contraddistingue il titolo di questo post prende spunto dal titolo della commedia che ho visto ieri sera (notevole successo nei cartelloni romani, i più arguti avranno già intuito il titolo). Con l’occasione ho rivisto una coppia di amici che non vedevo da un bel pezzo. La buona creanza vorrebbe che in circostanze come queste ci si saluti con Baci e Abbracci, ma come spesso accade non sono riuscito a lasciare la mia smania per la tecnologia fuori delle porte del teatro. Con malcelato orgoglio ho scoperto difatti che il mio amico è assiduo lettore di queste pagine, con la conseguenza che, come si dice da queste parti, è “andato in fissa” per l’Androide.

Fortunatamente per lui la “fissa” è arrivata al momento giusto poiché mi ha confessato che Babbo Natale,  probabilmente anche lui assiduo frequentatore di questo blog, ha lasciato sotto il suo albero uno splendido Galaxy S, e sotto quello della sua dolce metà un altrettanto splendido HTC Desire HD.

Ormai ho perso il conto degli amici che ho convinto a salire sul carro di Mountain View (ai quali si è da poco aggiunto anche il mio caro amico, collega e blogger  David Cenciotti) e anche se continuo a constatare con ironica amarezza che l’unico che ancora manca all’appello è mio fratello (ma spero sempre in un infarto improvviso del suo Blackberry), devo comunque ammettere che nessuno di loro si è (ancora) pentito dell’acquisto.

Bene! La fase 1.0 dell’Androide, lo smartphone, può dirsi conclusa e siamo ormai maturi per la fase 2.0: il tablet.

Lasciando per un attimo le rive del Tevere e analizzando il panorama a livello globale i  tempi sono (quasi) maturi: la notizia di questi giorni è il brusco calo relativo alle vendite dei PC worldwide nel corso del 2010 secondo i dati dei maggiori analisti di settore IDC e Gartner (che come al solito non sono d’accordo su quasi nulla). I colossi delle ricerche di mercato, in due studi distinti relativi alle vendite su scala planetaria, hanno rilevato che nel corso dell’anno appena terminato l’incremento su base annua relativo alle vendite dei PC si è attestato rispettivamente al 2.7% e 3.1% a fronte di previsioni che i due colossi attestavano rispettivamente al 5.5% e 4.8%.

IDC identifica la causa di questa debacle planetaria, oltre che in una generale tendenza al risparmio dei consumatori (che raschiano  il fondo del barile delle risorse dei loro vecchi PC), al fenomeno di cannibalizzazione delle tavolette, che hanno spostato verso di sé l’attenzione (e il portafoglio) di molti acquirenti, soprattutto se interessati a funzioni business (consultazioni di documenti o posta elettronica). Questi utenti non sono particolarmente esosi di CPU ma probabilmente tra breve i tablet strizzeranno gli occhi anche  agli hardcore user (come si definiscono in termine tecnico) se si considera che Sony Ericsson sta per lanciare sul mercato il Playstation Phone equipaggiato con l’Androide, specificamente rivolto ai videogiocatori mobili.

Ad ogni modo tornando al nostro microcosmo, dopo aver ammirato lo splendore dei gioielli di famiglia dal cuore  pulsante d’Androide, il discorso non poteva che finire sui tablet: il mio amico ha elevate esigenze di mobilità, necessita di leggere la posta elettronica, consultare documenti e nel contempo deve portarsi dietro cataloghi da mostrare (come è cambiato il mondo rispetto ai bei faldoni di una volta!): in parole povere l’humus tecnologico ideale per un tablet che non a caso rientra nelle sue prossime intenzioni di acquisto.

Poche parole ed ecco che, inevitabilmente, si materializza la domanda che nessun geek vorrebbe sentirsi porre:

Quale Tablet mi compro?

La risposta non è banale poiché si compone in due piani: un piano soggettivo e un piano (s)oggettivo. Necessita quindi di un post dedicato in cui spiegherò cosa ho risposto a questa domanda e perché…

La Corsa Dell’Androide

December 2, 2010 1 comment

Secondo una recente analisi di IDC, l’Androide Verde di Mountan View si appresta a superare il gigante di Espoo nel Vecchio Continente a livello di vendite di Smartphone. Nel 3Q del 2010 Nokia deteneva ancora il primato nel mercato  dell’Europa Occidentale con il 34% del mercato, seguita dalla Mela Morsicata con il 24% e l’Androide Verde al 23%. Lo scenario è destinato a cambiare nel prossimo trimestre in quanto l’analista Fransciso Jeronimo prevede che il sistema operativo mobile di Google si posizionerà stabilmente al primo posto (a livello mondiale detiene già il secondo posto alle spalle di Symbian) sospinto dal rilascio imminente di Android 2.3 Gingerbread.

Per quanto riguarda i produttori di smartphone equipaggiati con l’Androide, i terminali HTC continuano ad essere il desiderio (Desire) degli utenti, e spingono il colosso di Taiwan al primo posto con il 39%, seguono a ruota Sony Ericsson e Samsung rispettivamente con il 27% e 14%.

Da notare nell’articolo le percentuali irrisorie di Windows Mobile. Riuscirà il Colosso di Redmond a recuperare il ritardo? Nel frattempo vi ricordo il fantastico sondaggio.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,746 other followers