Archive
1-15 September 2012 Cyber Attacks Timeline
Here it is the usual compilation for the Cyber Attacks in the first half of September, a period which has apparently confirmed the revamping of hacktivism seen in August.
Several operations such as #OpFreeAssange (in support of Julian Assange), #OpTPB2 against the arrest of The Pirate Bay Co-Founder Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, and #OpIndipendencia in Mexico have characterized the first half of September. Curiously the hacktivists have also characterized this period for a couple of controversial events: the alleged leak of 1 million of UDIDs from FBI (later proven to be fake) and the alleged attack to GoDaddy (later proven to be a network issue, that is the reason why I not even mentioned it in this timeline). Other actions motivated by hacktivists have been carried on by Pro-Syrian hackers.
From a Cyber Crime perspective, there are two events particularly interesting (even if well different): the alleged leak of Mitt Romney’s tax returns and yet another breach against a Bitcoin Exchange (Bitfloor), worthing the equivalent of 250,000 USD which forced the operator to suspend the operations.
If you want to have an idea of how fragile our data are inside the cyberspace, have a look at the timelines of the main Cyber Attacks in 2011 and 2012 and the related statistics (regularly updated), and follow @paulsparrows on Twitter for the latest updates.
Also, feel free to submit remarkable incidents that in your opinion deserve to be included in the timelines (and charts).
August 2012 Cyber Attacks Statistics
It’s time for the stats related to the Cyber Attacks Timeline of August. I do not remember a month so characterized by Hacktivism like this! The reason is mainly due to the actions motivated by the so-called OpFreeAssange, the waves of cyber attacks in favor of Julian Assange and, most of all in the first part of the month, to the OpDemonoid, the attacks targeting Ukrainan sites after the shutdown of the famous torrent tracker.
Let us begin with the Motivations Behind Attacks Chart. More than one half of the attacks of my sample (58%) were motivated by hacktivism, in line with the data of July (when the value was 55%). Cyber Crime motivated attacks rank at number two, with the 36% of occurrences, even in this case a value substantially in line with the previous month when it was at 31%. Cyber Espionage and Cyber Crime are well behind with the 3% respectively.
Moving forward to the chart regarding the Distribution Of Attack Techniques, there is a predominance of SQLi, which confirms to be the preferred weapon for Hacktivists or Cyber Criminals. DDoS (real or claimed) counts for nearly one third of the occurrence (32,4% real plus a further 2,9% claimed). Of Course, keep always in mind that data refer only to my sample and do not take into account all the defacements (make a jump to Zone-H and you will realize that is simply impossible) unless they are particularly meaningful.
Last but not least, the Distribution Of Targets chart clearly reflects the predominance of hacktivism in this month. In fact target belonging to governments rank at number one with the 19% of occurrences. Industries and organizations are immediately behind with respectively the 16.2% and the 15.2%. Inside industry, technology has been the most targeted sector, this is mainly due to the (controversial) Philips hack, but also to other remarkable cyber attacks such as AMD and AVX Corporation.
Of course, as usual, data must be taken very carefully since they do refer only to discovered attacks (the so-called tip of the iceberg), and hence do not pretend to be exhaustive but only aim to provide an high level overview of the “cyber landscape” of the considered period. Moreover, remember that the most dangerous threats are the invisible ones.
If you want to have an idea of how fragile our data are inside the cyberspace, have a look at the timelines of the main Cyber Attacks in 2011 and 2012 (regularly updated). Also have a look at the 2012 Cyber Attacks Statistics and follow @paulsparrows on Twitter for the latest updates.
Also, feel free to submit remarkable incidents that in your opinion deserve to be included in the timelines (and charts).
Related articles
- 1 – 15 August Cyber Attacks Statistics (hackmageddon.com)
- Several Small Enhancements to 2012 Cyber Attacks Statistics (hackmageddon.com)
16 – 31 August 2012 Cyber Attacks Timeline
Here the first part with the timeline from 1 to 15 August 2012.
Here we are with the second part of the August 2012 Cyber Attacks Timeline. A second part of the month that has been characterized by hacktivism, most of all because of the so-called OperationFreeAssange, which has targeted many high-profile websites.
Among the targets of the month, Philips has been particularly “unlucky”. The Dutch giant has been the victim of three Cyber Attacks, even if there are several doubts about the authenticity of the hacks.
But maybe the biggest operation of the month is the #ProjectHellFire, carried on by the collective @TeamGhostShell, that has unleashed something as 1 million of accounts belonging to different sectors (banks, government agencies, consulting firms, law enforcement and the CIA). And the group promises new action for this Fall and Winter.
The Middle East confirms to be very hot, with a new Cyber Attack, probably another occurrence of Shamoon, targeting RasGas, yet another Oil Company.
Just one note: of course it is impossible to track all the targets of the #OpFreeAssange. You can find a complete list at cyberwarnews.info.
If you want to have an idea of how fragile our data are inside the cyberspace, have a look at the timelines of the main Cyber Attacks in 2011 and 2012 and the related statistics (regularly updated), and follow @paulsparrows on Twitter for the latest updates.
Also, feel free to submit remarkable incidents that in your opinion deserve to be included in the timelines (and charts).
Privacy e Cinguettii…
Una volta i piccioni viaggiatori trasportavano i messaggi, oggi i canarini azzurri trasportano gli ordini della Corte Federale USA.
Parlando di sicurezza sembra proprio che il Social Network sia destinato a diventare (nel bene e nel male) il protagonista del 2011, e questo non solo perché le previsoni dei principali produttori lo identificano come vettore privilegiato delle nuove forme di Malware.
E’ di oggi la notizia che, in data 14 dicembre il Dipartimento Di Giustizia degli Stati Uniti avrebbe ordinato a Twitter di fornire tutte le informazioni relative all’account (corrispondenza, tweet, etc.) di alcuni utenti legati a Wikileaks dal 1 novembre 2009 ad oggi. Al Social Network sarebbero stati forniti 3 giorni per fornire le informazioni richieste.
Gli utenti in questione sono:
- Birgitta Jónsdóttir (@birgittaj), uno dei 63 membri del parlamento isalndese;
- Bradley Manning, il soldato dell’esercito U.S: accusato di avere svelato informazioni classificate;
- Jacob Appbelbaum (@ioerror), volontario di WIkileaks;
- Rop Gonggrijp (@rop_g), hacker olandese e co-fondatore del Provider XS4ALL);
- Ed infine, l’immancabile Julian Assange, ormai noto fondatore di Wikileaks.
Gli (inizialmente) ignari uttenti sono stati oggetto di un provvedimento 2703(d), che consente alla polizia di ottenere determinate informazioni da un sito Web o da un provider nel caso in cui le stesse siano
“relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation.”
La notizia è stata diffusa il 7 gennaio dal membro del parlamento islandese Birgitta Jónsdóttir, coinvolta nella richiesta, poiché, in maniera apparentemente inspiegabile, ieri pomeriggio è stata avvisata dal Canarino Azzurro Twitter dell’esistenza dell’ordine e della possibilità di opporsi entro 10 giorni alla richiesta di informazioni.
A questo link il testo della mail.
Il motivo di questo dietrofront, è solo apparentemente inspiegabile. Secondo il commentatrore di CNET il provvedimento 2703(d), così come imposto a Twitter, potrebbe essere incostituzionale in quanto richiede la notifica al diretto destinatario. Questo fatto ha probabimente indotto il Giudice Magistrato Theresa Buchanan, autore del provvedimento, di rivelarlo lo scorso giovedì (PDF) e autorizzare di conseguenza Twitter a
“disclose that order to its subscribers and customers,”



